United States v. Tawahongva
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ASPEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, asserting a conviction on the charge against him, a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, would be unconstitutional. Defendant contends his conviction would violate his right to the free exercise of his religion, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant argues that requiring him to acquire a permit prior to taking golden eagles constitutes a substantial burden on the free exercise of his religion and, therefore, that the Religious Freedom…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MannehDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. AdeyemoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008