Legal Opinion

Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 18, 1956No. C. D. 1815PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Once again we are called upon to consider the tariff classification proper for frog legs. Controversy over this issue has continued for 50 years, and there are numerous decisions.

The merchandise here is frog legs that were imported from Japan through the port of New York. These frog legs were classified under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article and charged with duty at 10 per centum ad valorem.

The protest presents two alternative claims, both for enumerated classification. The first claim is that frog legs should be classified as game, not specially provided…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Pacific Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Dynamic Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API