Legal Opinion
Smith v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 1924No. 14578PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLSON, ,T.
The controversy here presented arises from an order of the Corporation Commission allowing Charles H. Ruth, Charles B. Selby, of the firm of Selby & Callahan, and H. F. Tripp an attorneys’ fee, and directing the payment thereof out of funds collected by tha Corporation Commisson from the Oklahoma Cas & Electric Company, and the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, as refunds due various gas consumers in Oklahoma City.
It appears that during the months of Decémber, 1917, and January, li>18. the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, a public utility, distributing natural gas in Oklahoma City,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Oklahoma City v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Okla. Natural Gas Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Monson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Croxton v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.