Lillie v. Dennert
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District-of Michigan; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. Charles P. Uillie, tire assignee of a judgment, moved for an execution against Paul Dennert, one of tire defendants, who filed a petition praying the court to enter satisfaction of the judgment. Satisfaction of the judgment was ordered entered, and Charles P. Uillie brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANFORD, District Judge.
This writ of error is brought to review an order entering satisfaction of a judgment obtained in the court below.
On December 17, 1913, one Charles R. Horrie, the plaintiff in an action at law brought against one Edgar P. Daggett and Paul Dennert, the defendant in error, as joint tort feasors, obtained a judgment against them jointly for $2,683 and costs. On February 9, 1915, this judgment was assigned by Horrie to Charles P. Lillie, the plaintiff in error.
This assignment having been hied in the clerk’s office, Lillie moved the court for the issuance of a body execution…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Parker v. MauldinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Hart v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Tacco Falcon Point, Inc. v. Atlantic Ltd. Partnership XIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.