Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Bay of New York Coal & Supply Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 1945No. 25PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises rather narrow issues as to the power of the Price Administrator to issue a subpoena duces tecum which the courts must enforce, under § 202 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 922, while he has actions, pending for statutory damages against the recalcitrant dealer. The main point made by respondent is that during the pendency of such actions, all proceedings for discovery are subject to the provisions of the rules of civil procedure, under which it has the advantage of opportunity to apply to the court for various…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mosseller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Hagen v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Glenn W. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Application to Enforce an Administrative Subpœna Duces Tecum of the Federal Trade Commission v. Waltham Watch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Federal Maritime Commission v. DeSmedtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.