Legal Opinion

United States v. Hudson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 10, 1978No. 33,855; CM 434373PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge.

The question before us is whether the accused was subject to court-martial trial. We conclude that he was.

THE FACTS

Accused is a member of the California Army National Guard. As provided by statute1 and regulation,2 with his consent and that of the Governor of California, he was ordered to active duty at Fort Gordon, Georgia, for a period of “21 weeks or upon completion of MOS [Military Occupational Speciality] training but not less than 4 months.” The 21-week period would haVe expired on August 7, 1975,3 but successive extensions were ordered to enable the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. PeelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. SelfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DouseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. BarbeauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. NewsomeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API