United States v. Hudson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COOK, Judge.
The question before us is whether the accused was subject to court-martial trial. We conclude that he was.
THE FACTS
Accused is a member of the California Army National Guard. As provided by statute1 and regulation,2 with his consent and that of the Governor of California, he was ordered to active duty at Fort Gordon, Georgia, for a period of “21 weeks or upon completion of MOS [Military Occupational Speciality] training but not less than 4 months.” The 21-week period would haVe expired on August 7, 1975,3 but successive extensions were ordered to enable the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. PeelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. SelfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DouseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. BarbeauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. NewsomeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.