Legal Opinion

In Re Atwater

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 20, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on October 12, 2009, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

FOR THE COURT

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hairston v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010