Legal Opinion
In Re Atwater
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 20, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Respondent was suspended on October 12, 2009, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.
/s/JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.
FOR THE COURT
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hairston v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010