Legal Opinion

In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 2010No. 26810PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this judicial disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RJDE, Rule 502, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of an admonition or public reprimand pursuant to Rule 7(b), RJDE, Rule 502, SCACR. We accept the agreement and impose a public reprimand. The facts as set forth in the agreement are as follows.

FACTS

A defendant who was charged with simple assault failed to appear for her trial before respondent. Respondent found the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API