Legal Opinion

Barnacascel v. Spivey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 716SC193Published

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

We agree with the parties and with the trial judge that by Item Sixth of the will of Asa Phelps his son, James, received only a life estate and that the devise of the remainder after his death “to his children in fee simple” did not invoke the Rule in Shelley’s case. Wright v. Vaden, 266 N.C. 299, 146 S.E. 2d 31; Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 92 S.E. 2d 682; Moore v. Baker, 224 N.C. 133, 29 S.E. 2d 452. Therefore, upon the death of James without having had a child or children, the devise of the remainder lapsed. By virtue of the statute in effect at the date of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Citizens National Bank v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Wright v. VadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API