Barnacascel v. Spivey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
We agree with the parties and with the trial judge that by Item Sixth of the will of Asa Phelps his son, James, received only a life estate and that the devise of the remainder after his death “to his children in fee simple” did not invoke the Rule in Shelley’s case. Wright v. Vaden, 266 N.C. 299, 146 S.E. 2d 31; Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 92 S.E. 2d 682; Moore v. Baker, 224 N.C. 133, 29 S.E. 2d 452. Therefore, upon the death of James without having had a child or children, the devise of the remainder lapsed. By virtue of the statute in effect at the date of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Citizens National Bank v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Wright v. VadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.