Legal Opinion

Wright v. Vaden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 770PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.

This action, being for the construction of a will, should have been brought in Gaston County where the will was adr mitted to probate. Since, however, no objection on this ground was taken in the court below, the improper venue was waived. Devereux v. Devereux, 81 N.C. 12; McIntosh, N. C. Practice and Procedure § 804 (1956).

The question presented by this appeal is whether, in the devise of the remainder after her death, the words “to the children or other lineal descendants of said Elsie May Johnson” are words of purchase, or words of limitation which bring the devise within the rule in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Campbell v. Everhart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Nichols v. . GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Hauser v. Craft.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Devereux v. . DevereuxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Hutton v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Summey ex rel. Summey v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Barnacascel v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Pugh v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API