Brannen v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EMERSON, J. *
Factual History
Charles S. Howard died in 1952 and his will was admitted to probate. The final distribution of the estate occurred years ago, but the probate court retained jurisdiction to oversee the administration of certain testamentary trusts. The will created nine such trusts. The assets of each included a one-ninth interest in a parcel of realty called the lone Ranch. Four of the trusts have terminated and their shares of the lone Ranch are now owned outright by the former beneficiaries or by their successors in interest. These parties will be referred to hereafter as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Estate of SmeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- CRY v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Forthmann v. BoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Estate of GumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.