Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 25, 1968No. P68/272; protests 63/11168, etc. (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging fixtures similar in all material respects to the wrought-iron ornaments the subject of Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 2289) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Alpine Importers of Calif. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 81, C.D. 2555), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Alpine Importers of Calif. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965