Legal Opinion

Miller v. Corporaton

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 12, 2017No. B271214PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

*218Joey Miller (Miller) sued defendant Fortune Commercial Corporation, the owner and operator of a chain of Seafood City markets, and several other defendants (collectively, Defendants), because, allegedly, they illegally denied him service when he tried to enter two different Seafood City stores with his service dog. Miller alleged three causes of action: violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act ( Civ. Code, § 51 et seq. (Unruh Act)1 ); violation of the Disabled Persons Act (§ 54 et seq. (DPA)); and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants moved for summary judgment arguing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cybernet Entertainment, LLC v. State Compensation Ins. FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Eloy Mascorro v. The City of National City, Olegario Garcia, Kaitlynn Norie, Sadiq Al-Mosawi, Reynaldo Velazquez, Marc Vargas, Rowdy Pauu, Jane Does 1–2, and John Does 1–2District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Ezeokoli v. Uber Technologies CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. John-Thomas Doljanin v. Reuben Ellis, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
  5. John-Thomas Doljanin v. Reuben Ellis, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API