Legal Opinion
Ezeokoli v. Uber Technologies CA1/3
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2021No. A156445Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 1/26/21 Ezeokoli v. Uber Technologies CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE BENEDICT EZEOKOLI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A156445 v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.