Legal Opinion

Amarlite Architectural v. Copeland Glass

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. 1901583 and 1901584PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amarlite Architectural Products, Inc., and Marvins, Inc., appeal from a judgment in favor of United States Fidelity Guaranty Company ("USF G"), in the amount of $21,748.66. The trial judge ruled, following an ore tenus hearing, that deposits made into an AmSouth Bank account by Copeland Glass Company, Inc., had been deposited into a "special account" and, therefore, were not subject to garnishment by Amarlite and Marvins, and he further ruled that the funds deposited in the account in question were the property of USF G.

In 1990, Amarlite and Marvins, Inc., obtained separate judgments against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayden v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Purma v. StarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Savig v. First National Bank of OmahaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Jimenez v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Barrup v. BarrupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Morgan Stanley & Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API