Legal Opinion

Somavia v. Betts

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1958No. S. F. No. 19579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

The remainderman of a testamentary trust appeals from a judgment which, insofar as is here material, directs the trustee to pay $26,240 from the trust assets to the executrix of the estate of the life tenant, together with accumulated and unpaid interest thereon in the sum of $31,-066.43. A cross-appeal was taken by the respondent executrix, but has been abandoned.

The sum of $26,240 (the principal here) represents income earned during the probate administration of the trustor’s estate and distributed to the trustee (without segregation from the corpus) on October 20, 1932; it was not paid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of MarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Sponable v. DareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. D & L Nicolaysen (In Re D & L Nicolaysen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API