Legal Opinion

Derheim v. N. Fiorito Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1972No. 41802PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

The plaintiff, Lawrence Derheim (respondent), recovered a jury verdict for personal injuries incurred in a collision with a dump truck owned by defendant, N. Fiorito Company, Inc. (appellant), and operated by defendant’s employee. Defendant’s appeal to Division 2 of the Court of Appeals was certified to this court. Specifically, the so-called “seat belt defense” is a principal issue in the case, and as this court has not addressed itself to the appropriateness of this defense in automobile litigation, the Court of Appeals concluded that a fundamental issue of broad public interest is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Joan Laverne Henderson, Omarie Henderson, Sharon Marie Hass, and James F. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Sams v. SamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Amend v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kerby v. Abilene Christian CollegeTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Carnation Company v. WongTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Breault v. Ford Motor CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API