Legal Opinion

Heatherly v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 2008No. COA06-770PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

To pass constitutional muster, revenue bills must, inter alia, be “read three several times in each house of the General Assembly and passed three several readings, which readings shall have been on three different days.”1 Here, Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in holding that the North Carolina Education Lottery Act is not a revenue bill and thus was not required to be enacted under the mandated constitutional procedural requirements. Because we conclude that the Lottery Act was not a bill “enacted to raise money on the credit of the State, or to pledge the faith of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Briley v. FarabowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. North Carolina Turnpike Authority v. Pine Island, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Ennis v. State Highway CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swaps, LLC v. Asl Props., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Heatherly v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API