Legal Opinion
Cockrum v. Fox
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 2, 2004No. 04-42PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
On January 23, 2003, Barbara and David Abies, and on behalf of their unborn child, a viable fetus, filed suit against petitioner, Holly Cockrum, M.D., and ten unidentified John Does and Jane Does employed at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS). In their complaint for obstetrical medical malpractice, the Abies assert the following claims of negligence against Dr. Cockrum:
14. Dr. Cockrum was negligent in failing to diagnose the condition of Ms. Abies and Baby Abies, in failing to treat Ms. Abies and her unborn child for such condition as…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lupo v. LinebergerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Conner v. SimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Ramirez v. White County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Fore v. Circuit Court of Izard CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Erin, Inc. v. White County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Jones v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Coonrod v. SeaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Boyd v. Sharp County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Fields v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.