Legal Opinion

State v. Zamora

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 2010No. C070882CR; A141236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

The state appeals a trial court order suppressing all evidence seized during a search of defendant’s residence and evidence of defendant’s inculpatory statements made during that search. ORS 138.060(1)(c). Because we conclude that defendant consented to the search, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

We state the facts consistently with the trial court’s findings, which are supported by evidence in the record. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). The relevant facts are, in this case, largely undisputed. Two sheriffs deputies, Yazzolino and Irving, went to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LamoreuxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. PickleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. GrolingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API