Legal Opinion
Vincenzo v. Chairman, Board of Parole
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 10, 2001No. AC 19352PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiff, Dominic Vincenzo, filed this action against the defendant, the chairman of the board of parole (board), seeking a declaratory judgment that the board is an agency within the meaning of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes § 4-166 etseq., that the conditions of parole contained in his parole agreement are board regulations and that those regulations are invalid because the board did not enact them in accordance with the UAPA, specifically, its rule-making procedures. The board thereafter filed a motion to dismiss, claiming, among…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Miguel Coronado, Jr. v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Modzelewski v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Reid v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Andrew v. Warden, No. Cv99-2877 (Dec. 16, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Clemente v. Oronoque Golf, LLC, No. Cv02 39 38 53 S (Jan. 29, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.