Faison v. Walmart Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 VERNITA FAISON, No. 2:24-cv-01024-DJC-CSK 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 WALMART INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s initial 17 Complaint. (ECF No. 19.) At oral argument, the Court partially denied on the Motion, 18 finding that Plaintiff had Article III standing, Plaintiff had standing under the UCL, FAL, 19 and CLRA, the economic loss rule did not bar Plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation 20 claims, and Plaintiff could pursue both…