Legal Opinion

Coeling v. Barnard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1910No. Calendar No. 23,741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Replevin by Tite Coeling against Edward N. Barnard and another: On motion of plaintiff for leave to file a bond to stay proceedings pending an appeal to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Appellant was plaintiff in a replevin case at circuit, where a verdict was directed against him on November 2, 1909, with costs to be taxed. Said costs were afterwards taxed at the sum of $25.

Appellant caused a bill of exceptions to be settled and filed within the 20 days allowed by the statute. On November 26, 1909, he caused a writ of error to issue out of this court which has been returned, and the case is ,now pending here. He did not file the statutory bond to stay proceedings pending appeal, and defendant has caused execution to issue against him for the taxed costs. Appellant, by one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. American Brewing Co. v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Worden v. Judge of Manistee CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Pulte v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Pinel v. PinelMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API