Legal Opinion

Pinel v. Pinel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1912No. Calendar No. 25,152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill by Thomas F. Pinel and another against Charles W. Pinel, Rachel Pinel, and Rachel Campsel, to require defendant Rachel Pinel to pay taxes and interest on a mortgage covering premises in which defendant claimed a life estate. From a decree for complainants, defendant Rachel Pinel appeals. On petition of appellant to restrain proceedings to enforce the decree and on motion of appellees to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this case, pending an appeal by the defendant Rachel Pinel to this court from a decree entered in the court below on January 15, 1912, the said defendant has filed her petition here praying for an injunction to restrain the complainants from prosecuting a suit commenced by them before a circuit court commissioner for the recovery of possession of certain premises consisting of a farm, in which the said defendant had a life tenancy under the will of her deceased husband. By the terms of said will the complainants were left the remainder of a part' of the premises at the termination of said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coeling v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Commercial National Bank v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerasimos v. WartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Horbal v. St. John's Greek Catholic ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API