Legal Opinion

O'NEILL v. American Quasar Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1980No. 50741PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice:

The appellants, William E. Hulsizer and his wife Phyllis, own an overriding royalty interest in the leasehold of Joseph I. O'Neill, Jr. totaling 1% of Vsths in and to 77.31 acres of a 640-acre drilling and spacing unit located in Section 12-18N-20W of Dewey County, Oklahoma. Mr. O’Neill also assigned an override of 1.5625% of all oil and gas produced to appellants Howard L. and Jacqueline Kennedy, which was convertible at the election of the assignees to a 6.25% working interest upon payout of the unit well. An identical override of 1.5625% convertible to a 6.25% working…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Samuel G. Whitaker and Elizabeth Whitaker v. Texaco Inc. (Formerly Named the Texas Company), a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Kingwood Oil Company v. Hall-Jones Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Thornburgh v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Seal v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Ranola Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. McDonald v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API