Seal v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
This consolidated appeal presents to this Court issues regarding the constitutionality of 52 O.S.Supp.1983 §§ 541-547 (Act) and the validity of Rules 6-100 through 6-113 (Rules) promulgated by the Oklahoma Cor*283poration Commission (Commission) in Order No. 250466.
Appellants Amerada Hess Corporation, et al. (collectively Amerada) challenge the constitutionality of both the Act and the Rules. The major thrust of Amerada’s arguments is twofold: (1) the Act and Rules are not a valid exercise of the state’s police power and are thus violative of the due process provisions of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.