Legal Opinion
Lobel v. Trade Bank
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided April 12, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This is a motion made by the defendants to dismiss the amended complaint, on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Plaintiff brings this action against the defendant Trade Bank of New York, Karl Schenk, its president, Henry Schenk, its vice-president, and the defendant Herbert Mandelbaum, demanding the sum of $1,500 as damages suffered; that being the reasonable amount of the counsel fees incurred by him in defense of an action brought against him in the Supreme Court, New York county, by the defendant Trade Bank…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dean v. . KochendorferNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Paul v. FargoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Cohen v. Nathaniel Fisher & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Metromedia, Inc. v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Luckett v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Hoffmann v. KimmelOregon Supreme Court · 1933