Legal Opinion

Britton v. Hartshorn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 29, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The plaintiff offered evidence that she was advised by her physician, Dr. Black, to go to Griffin Hospital at Derby and submit to an operation to be performed by the defendant, for the removal of a uterine tumor, consented to do so and went to the hospital for that purpose. The defendant made a physical examination and informed her that the tumor could only be cured by removal. At no time was anything said to her about an exploratory operation for the purpose of ascertaining the kind of tumor or its size or extent, or any other operation than one to remove it. She consented to this and was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  4. State v. HousekeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Slimak v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Haliburton v. General Hospital Society of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API