Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hess

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 19, 2016No. 20150289-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

ORME, Judge:

1T 1. Thomas L. Norton appeals the district court's ruling that his cause of action against Autumn Hess is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, even as extended by. Utah's savings statute. We affirm..

' {2 Norton and Hess were involved in an automobile accxdent nearly a decade ago, on December 6,:2006. Three years and 862 days later-three days short of the running of the applicable four-year statute of limitations-Norton sued Hess, alleging that Hess's negligence caused Norton's injuries, According to rule 4 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Oates v. ChavezUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Beaver County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hebertson v. Bank One, Utah, N.A.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Falkenrath v. Candela CorporationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goldsworthy v. KanatzarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  2. Fritsche v. Deer Valley RidgeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Sabour v. KollerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. Ratner v. SkyWest AirlinesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API