Falkenrath v. Candela Corporation
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
ORME, Judge:
T1 Appellant Annika Falkerirath received severe burns while undergoing a laser hair-removal treatment with a machine manufactured by Candela Corporation and opérated by employees of Elase, Inc. 2 Following her injury, Falkenrath sued Elase for negligence, and then, almost five years after sustaining the injury, she joined Candela as a defendant. Because Falkenrath did not bring her cause of action agamst Candela until after the four-year statute of limitations had run, and because the district court concluded that the equitable discovery rule did not apply, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Shawn Owens v. William E. Boyd, Warden, Western Illinois Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Horton v. Goldminer's DaughterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Hickman v. GroverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norton v. HessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Rocky Mountain Builders Supply Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017