Legal Opinion
Freedom Transportation, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 9, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02602Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS FREEDOM TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:18-CV-02602-JAR-KGG NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Freedom Transportation, Inc. filed this action against Defendants Navistar International Corporation and Navistar, Inc. (“Navistar Defendants”), Allstate Fleet and Equipment Sales of Houston, Inc. (“Allstate”), and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, and Penske Logistics LLC (the “Penske Defendants”), alleging a variety of claims stemming…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States Rubber Company v. Francis WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.