Legal Opinion

Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 1948PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance- — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Stone v. Royal Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. KSI Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API