Legal Opinion

Robert Kennedy v. City of Cincinnati

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2010No. 09-3089PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Jeffrey Zucker and David Hudepohl appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment based on the defense of qualified immunity from plaintiff Robert Kennedy’s procedural due process claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons that follow, we reverse in part and affirm in part. In doing so, we hold that Kennedy did not have a protectable property interest in his $10 City pool token, but possessed a clearly established constitutionally-protected liberty interest not to be banned from all City recreational property without procedural due…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Eduardo Jacobs v. Raymon AlamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Samuel Campbell v. City of Springboro, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Hannemann v. Southern Door County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Catrena Green v. Adam ThrockmortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Carol Vincent v. City of SulphurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API