Legal Opinion
Eduardo Jacobs v. Raymon Alam
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2019No. 17-2159/18-1124PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant law enforcement officials Raymon Alam, Dave Weinman, and Damon Kimbrough searched for a fugitive in a house in which plaintiff Eduardo Jacobs lived. Following the search, plaintiff returned home from work, and according to the officers, confronted, pointed a gun at, and then shot at them. The officers returned fire and arrested plaintiff. But that is not the version of the facts we have before us in this interlocutory appeal. Plaintiff admits he had a holstered pistol, but denies that he touched it-let alone drew, pointed, and shot it at the officers.
After a…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Jerry Smith, Jr. v. Melvin FinkleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Pearlie Gambrel v. Knox Cnty., Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Salvatore Palma, Jr. v. Matthew JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- RLR Investments, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- William LaPlante v. City of Battle Creek, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.