Legal Opinion

In re Joanne P.

New York City Family Court

Decided August 11, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George L. Jurow, J.

This child protective proceeding pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act presents yet another test of the increasingly familiar but important issue of what constitutes suffi*755cient corroboration of the child victim’s out-of-court statements. The instant case appears to present a fact pattern that tests the more outer boundaries or limits of the corroboration standard.

This court holds that in a child sex abuse proceeding under article 10 of the Family Court Act, the corroboration requirement in Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (vi) is satisfied when a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In re Leslie K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Charges of Association of the Bar v. RandelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. In re Nicole V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The People v. Willie L. WraggNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In re Anita U.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API