Legal Opinion

The People v. Willie L. Wragg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2015No. 152PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rivera, J.

Defendant Willie L. Wragg seeks reversal of his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree on the ground that he was denied meaningful representation due to his attorney’s alleged deficient performance. In the alternative, defendant contends he should be resentenced because the trial court improperly treated him as a second child sexual assault felony offender, inasmuch as the People failed to file a predicate offender statement prior to the commencement of trial, as provided for under CPL 400.19 (2). We find both grounds without merit, and therefore affirm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. EveryNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. The People v. Leonard WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. Lopez-MendozaCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2019

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API