Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. Linton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1925No. 4267PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIDEON, C. J.'

William Sweatman instituted this action to recover damages upon an alleged malicious prosecution on the part of B. J. Linton and the Nuckolls Packing Company, a corporation. The complaint charges:

“That on the 1st day of April, 1924, at Price, in the county of Carbon, state of Utah, the defendants then and there, maliciously intending to injure the plaintiff in his good name and reputation, and intending to cause him to lose time, expense, and injury to his business and property, appeared before J. H. Hammond, a justice of the peace of Price precinct, Carbon county, state of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neenan v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Sparrow v. BromageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Street Railway v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. SesslerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Freeland v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Miera v. GeorgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Oman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Featherstone v. SchaerrerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Steadman v. TophamWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API