Legal Opinion

Warner v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1983No. Docket Nos. S.F. 24388, 24519PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Jack Irwin Warner was admitted to the practice of law in California in 1959. We review two separate disciplinary recommendations of the State Bar Court which we have consolidated for purposes of argument and opinion. (See Gordon v. State Bar (1982) 31 Cal.3d 748, 750 [183 Cal.Rptr. 861, 647 P.2d 137].)

In S.F. 24388, the State Bar recommends that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years, that execution of suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for three years on conditions of actual suspension for one year and compliance…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Herrscher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Galardi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API