Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Spiers v. Lawley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1911No. Civ. No. 866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lake County, and from an order denying a new trial. Thos. J. Lennon, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Theodore A. Bell, John T. York, and Charles A. Shurtleff, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a proceeding in quo warranto.

The complaint charges that the defendants have "usurped, intruded into and unlawfully held and exercised," and so continue wrongfully and without right to exercise a certain franchise for the construction and maintenance of a toll road starting from a certain point in Napa county and extending into and terminating at a certain point in Lake county, and for the collection of tolls thereon, and asks the judgment of the court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Norwich Gas Light Co. v. Norwich City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Oakland Railroad v. Oakland, Brooklyn, & Fruit Vale RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Bowman v. WathenDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1841
  5. Wood v. Truckee Turnpike Co.California Supreme Court · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abrams v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Copt-Air, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Menzel Estate Co. v. City of ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. County of Kern v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. South Bay Expressway, L.P. v. Otay River Constructors (In Re South Bay Expressway, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API