Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Wathen

District Court, D. Indiana

Decided May 15, 1841PublishedCited by 31 opinions

[In equity. Bill by Isaac S. Bowman, George W. S. Bowman,-Brinker, Mary Brinker, Itebecea Bowman, and Albert T. Burnley, against Athanasius Wathen and the mayor and common council of the city of Jeffersonville, to enjoin the use of a ferry, and for an accounting.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The complainants claim a ferry right from Jefferson-ville, in Indiana, across the Ohio river to Louisville, in Kentucky, which is in the possession and enjoyment of the defendant, Wathen, who claims one half of it, and which the complainants pray, in pursuance of their right, may be decreed to them. The complainants, except Burnley, claim as devi-sees of Isaac S. Bowman, and he claims as their assignee. Bowman was attached to the regiment commanded by George Rogers Clark, and to whom the state of Virginia granted one hundred and fifty thousand acres of land, lying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Harrington v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Palmer v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  4. Jackson ex dem. Lathrop v. DemontNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  5. Fite v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cream of Wheat Co. v. County of Grand ForksSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. The People v. . the Canal AppraisersNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. McManus v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Billings v. BreinigMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API