Legal Opinion
Bicas v. Superior Court in and for Pima Cty.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 26, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2522PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
Did the respondent court abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to exclude the attorneys for the real parties in interest from further representation of them in pending superior court litigation? We agree with petitioners that the answer is yes.
Petitioners are the plaintiffs in a pending superior court action against the real parties in interest. (Hereinafter petitioners are referred to as plaintiffs or by name and real party in interest Michael P. Kahn as defendant.) The lawsuit involves the sale of certain assets by defendant to plaintiffs pursuant to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gas-A-Tron of Arizona and Coinoco v. Union Oil Company of California, Petrol Stops Northwest v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- American Roller Company v. William D. Budinger, an Individual Appeal of E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Kurbitz v. KurbitzWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Edelman v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Rodriguez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- United States v. CatalanottoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.