Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Zuber

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1928No. Docket No. 3540PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The trial court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the third amended complaint, without leave to amend, and judgment was thereupon entered against the plaintiff, who prosecutes this appeal from the judgment.

The action was commenced January 20, 1926, for the recovery of certain real property purchased by the defendant at a sale under a trust deed on January 20, 1921. The facts herein stated are alleged in the complaint.

The trust deed was executed by the plaintiff October 18, 1915, to secure the payment of his promissory note of the same date for $13,868, payable to the defendant two years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Winbigler v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Lupertino v. CarbahalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API