Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Privett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1917No. 6544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Pauline Bailey and others against George 0. Beidleman and others for the cancellation of certain deeds and for the enforcement of a contract of sale. Judgment for the other defendants against plaintiffs and the defendant Beidleman, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Okmulgee county by Pauline Bailey and Isparhecher Brown against George 0. Beidleman, W. E. Privett, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bank of Bixby, Okla., and Mrs. M. A. Brown, for the Cancellation of certain deeds and 'mortgages on the land allotted to one Charles McNack, deceased, a citizen of the Creek Nation of Indians, and for the enforcement of a contract of sale entered into by the defendant Beidleman with the plaintiffs, who claimed to he the owners of the land as heirs of the said Charles McNack, deceased.

The defendant Beidleman, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. D'Yarmett v. CobeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clovis v. ClovisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Lowrance v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Penny v. VoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Cudjo v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API