Legal Opinion

Wainscott v. Penikoff

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 2, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered against him in a forcible detainer action.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he was entitled to the possession of certain premises on West Madison street, Chicago, and that defendant unlawfully withheld possession of the premises from plaintiff although plaintiff made demand therefor in accordance with the statute.

Defendant filed an answer denying in general terms that plaintiff was entitled to possession of the premises and that the defendant unlawfully withheld possession.

Subsequently plaintiff filed a motion for a summary judgment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SanculiusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. La Prise v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Schornick v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Bell Fuels, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Koukoulomatis v. Disco Wheels, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Beals v. HuffmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Killian v. Welfare Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  5. Craig v. LaunerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API