Legal Opinion

In re: With Purpose, Inc. v. Winston & Strawn LLP, and Michael Blankenship

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 8, 2026No. 25-03105Unknown

1Opinion

ER. CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ky Se) SA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PL, * ENTERED 4 mn i Jo} THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON G\ eal oe jg THE COURT’S DOCKET Oy LS * Vasa The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. 7 7 ahs A f ed Signed September 8, 2026 $$$ AA_@=__>__ United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION In re: § § CASE NO. 23-30246-MVL7 WITH PURPOSE, INC. § (CHAPTER 7) § Debtor. § a § SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE, § § Plaintiff, § ADVERSARY NO. 25-03105-MVL § V. § §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Newman v. Plains All Amer PipelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API