Legal Opinion
Michael K. Anusbigian v. Trugreen/chemlawn, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1996No. 94-1875PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, J., delivered the opinio'n of the court, in which SILER, J., joined. RYAN, J. (pp. 1257-60), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether this court has jurisdiction to review a district court order remanding a removed action to the state court from which it was removed. The district court ordered the remand sua sponte upon concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy did not exceed $50,000 as required for federal court jurisdiction over actions based on diversity of citizenship. For the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Johanna Hernandez v. Seminole CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Godsey v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- DaWalt v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Charvat v. GVN Michigan, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Benedor Corp. v. Conejo Enterprises, Inc. (In re Conejo Enterprises, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.