Legal Opinion

Marks v. Philadelphia Wholesale Drug Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1954No. Civ. A. 13560PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are factors engaged in lending money to business enterprises which loans are usually secured by assignments of accounts receivable. This present action was brought to recover on an alleged account receivable assigned to plaintiffs for value by American Vitamin Associates, Inc., at the time in question a California corporation. The amount actually sought to be recovered by the plaintiffs is $6,800. On May 5, 1954, after trial, a jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs in the amount of $269.-06 with interest for a total recovery of $318.36. Plaintiffs filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Fine v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Long v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Madison-Kipp Corp. v. Price Battery Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson H. Trout v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. LaurelliDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. United States v. McCurryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Bell v. MykytiukDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Haddigan v. HarkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API