Legal Opinion

Kotvan v. Kirk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1-99-0046PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cousins

Plaintiff, Millie Kotvan, brought this action for medical negligence against defendants, Kent Kirk, an ophthalmologist, and Kirk Eye Center (KEC). Plaintiff alleged that Dr. Kirk failed to timely diagnose and treat an infection that plaintiff developed after cataract surgery. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. The trial court denied plaintiffs posttrial motion.

On appeal, plaintiff contends that: (1) the jury’s verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence; (2) the trial court erred by finding that the defense expert, Dr. Rubenstein, was qualified to testify…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Borowski v. Von SolbrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Seef v. Ingalls Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Cetera v. DiFilippoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. In Re Detention of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Krklus v. StanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Mele v. Howmedica, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API