Propst v. State

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Appellant Scottie Propst appeals his convictions and sentences for robbery and other related offenses. In his seven enumerations of error, Propst challenges, among other things, the constitutionality of OCGA§ 16-3-24.2.Propstclaims,ashedidbelow,thatOCGA § 16-3-24.2 violates his right to equal protection under the Georgia and United *558States Constitutions. For the reasons that follow below, and finding no additional error, we affirm.1

1. In two enumerations of error, Propst contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions. Viewed in a…