Legal Opinion

Hertz v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 4, 2013No. S13A1288PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Probate Judge Andrew Bennett denied James Hertz’s application for a license to carry a weapon under OCGA § 16-11-129 based on Hertz’s 1994 nolo contendere plea to five felony charges in Florida. Hertz filed a complaint for mandamus in superior court, alleging the denial violated the state statute and his constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Denying mandamus, the superior court found that the probate judge followed the statutory requirements in denying Hertz’s application and that this denial did not violate the federal or state constitutions. Because Hertz’s nolo…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. Antwain T. WatersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  2. Major v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Bello v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Bell v. HargroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  5. Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API